What is the U.S. Copyright Office’s position on AI generated artwork?

The U.S. Copyright Office’s current position on AI-generated artwork is that it is not copyrightable if it is created solely by an AI system without any human input. This is because copyright law requires that works be created by a human author.

In 2022, the Copyright Office issued a final determination that a work of art created entirely by an AI system called Creativity Machine was not copyrightable. The Copyright Review Board affirmed the Office’s decision, stating that “copyright law only protects ‘the fruits of intellectual labor’ that ‘are founded in the creative powers of the [human] mind.'”

In 2023, the Copyright Office issued a notice of inquiry in the Federal Register to gather information about current AI technologies and their impact on copyright law and policy. The Office is particularly interested in feedback on the following issues:

  • What are the different ways that AI is being used to create and distribute works of art?
  • What are the copyright implications of these different uses?
  • Are there any changes to copyright law that would be necessary to address the challenges and opportunities presented by AI?

The Copyright Office is expected to issue a report on its findings in 2024.

It is important to note that the Copyright Office’s position on AI-generated artwork is not binding on the courts. However, it is likely to be persuasive to judges in any future cases involving this issue.

In the meantime, artists who use AI in their work should take steps to document their own creative contributions to the work. This will help them to establish copyright ownership in the event that their work is challenged.

/0 Comments/by

Should I own my trademark as an individual owner or through an entity?

There are both benefits and drawbacks to owning a trademark through an individual versus a corporation.

Benefits of owning a trademark through an individual:

  • Simplicity: It is simpler and less expensive to apply for a trademark as an individual than as a corporation.
  • Flexibility: Individuals have more flexibility in how they use and license their trademarks. For example, an individual can easily transfer ownership of a trademark to another individual, or they can license the trademark to another business.
  • Personal control: Individuals have more personal control over their trademarks. This is because the trademark is owned by the individual, not by a separate business entity.

Drawbacks of owning a trademark through an individual:

  • Personal liability: If an individual trademark owner is sued, their personal assets could be at risk. This is because there is no separation between the individual and their business.
  • Difficulty transferring ownership: If an individual trademark owner wants to sell their business, they may have difficulty transferring ownership of the trademark. This is because the trademark is owned by the individual, not by the business.
  • Lack of credibility: Some customers and businesses may view trademarks owned by individuals as being less credible than trademarks owned by corporations.

Benefits of owning a trademark through a corporation:

  • Limited liability: Corporations offer limited liability protection to their owners. This means that if the corporation is sued, the personal assets of the owners are generally not at risk.
  • Ease of transfer: It is easier to transfer ownership of a trademark owned by a corporation than a trademark owned by an individual. This is because the trademark is owned by the corporation, not by the individual owners.
  • Credibility: Corporations are generally viewed as being more credible than individuals. This is because corporations are seen as being more stable and established.

Drawbacks of owning a trademark through a corporation:

  • Complexity: It is more complex and expensive to apply for a trademark as a corporation than as an individual.
  • Less flexibility: Corporations have less flexibility in how they use and license their trademarks. For example, a corporation must usually go through a formal process to license its trademark to another business.
  • Less personal control: Individuals have less personal control over trademarks owned by corporations. This is because the trademark is owned by the corporation, not by the individual owners.

Which option is right for you?

The decision of whether to own a trademark through an individual or a corporation depends on your specific circumstances. If you are a small business owner with limited assets, you may want to consider owning your trademark through an individual. This will give you more flexibility and control over your trademark, and it will be less expensive to apply for and maintain. However, you should be aware of the risks of personal liability.

If you are a larger business owner or if you are planning to sell your business in the future, you may want to consider owning your trademark through a corporation. This will provide you with limited liability protection and make it easier to transfer ownership of the trademark in the future. However, it will be more complex and expensive to apply for and maintain a trademark owned by a corporation.

If you have any questions, please consult with an attorney at WINTER LLP today to discuss your specific situation and to determine which option is best for you.

/0 Comments/by

Which Privacy Policies Allow Companies to Copy Your Content?

When you sign up for a new website or app, you are often asked to agree to a privacy policy. This policy outlines how the company will use your personal information. However, many privacy policies also include language that allows the company to copy your content.

Here are some of the terms that you should look for in a privacy policy:

  • “Collecting your content”: This term means that the company can collect any content that you create or post on its website or app. This includes text, images, videos, and audio recordings.
  • “Using your content”: This term means that the company can use your content for any purpose, including advertising, marketing, and research.
  • “Sharing your content”: This term means that the company can share your content with third-party companies. This can include advertisers, partners, and analytics providers.

If you see any of these terms in a privacy policy, you should be aware that the company may be able to copy your content without your permission. If you are concerned about your privacy, you should read the privacy policy carefully before you agree to it.

Here are some tips for protecting your content from being copied by companies:

  • Read the privacy policy carefully: Before you agree to a privacy policy, take the time to read it carefully. Look for any terms that allow the company to collect, use, or share your content.
  • Choose companies that have clear and transparent privacy policies: Some companies have clear and transparent privacy policies that explain how they will use your content. Others have privacy policies that are vague or confusing. It is important to choose companies that have clear and transparent privacy policies.
  • Use privacy-focused tools: There are a number of privacy-focused tools that can help you protect your content from being copied by companies. These tools can encrypt your content, block trackers, and prevent companies from collecting your data.
  • Be aware of the risks: Even if you take steps to protect your content, there is always a risk that it will be copied by companies. It is important to be aware of the risks and to take steps to mitigate them.

/0 Comments/by

Is AI-generated content copyright infringement?

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has led to a new debate about copyright law. Can AI-generated content be copyrighted? The answer is not entirely clear, and it is a question that is likely to be debated for years to come.

Copyright law protects original works of authorship, including literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works. However, copyright law does not protect works that are created by machines or other non-human entities. This is because copyright law requires that a work be created by a “human author.”

In the past, the question of whether AI-generated content could be copyrighted was a moot point. AI was not advanced enough to create original works of authorship. However, recent advances in AI have made it possible for AI to generate content that is indistinguishable from content created by humans.

This has led to some legal challenges. In 2018, the U.S. Copyright Office denied a copyright registration for an AI-generated poem. The Copyright Office ruled that the poem was not eligible for copyright protection because it was created by a machine.

However, the decision of the Copyright Office is not binding. It is possible that a court could rule that AI-generated content can be copyrighted, depending on the specific facts of the case.

There are several factors that a court would likely consider when determining whether AI-generated content is copyrightable. These factors include the level of human involvement in the creation of the content, the originality of the content, and the purpose of the content.

If the content is created with a high level of human involvement and is original, it is more likely to be considered copyrightable. However, if the content is created with little or no human involvement and is not original, it is less likely to be considered copyrightable.

The purpose of the content may also be a factor. If the content is created for commercial purposes, it is more likely to be considered copyrightable. However, if the content is created for educational or research purposes, it is less likely to be considered copyrightable.

The question of whether AI-generated content is copyright infringement is a complex one. There is no easy answer, and the law is likely to evolve as AI technology continues to develop. However, the factors discussed above provide some guidance on how courts may rule in future cases.

Here are some tips for avoiding copyright infringement when using AI-generated content:

  • Be aware of the level of human involvement in the creation of the content.
  • Consider the originality of the content.
  • Consider the purpose of the content.
  • If you are unsure whether the content is copyrighted, err on the side of caution and do not use it.

The law on AI-generated content is still evolving. However, by following these tips, you can help to minimize your risk of copyright infringement.

/0 Comments/by
Link to: Get in touch

Any questions? Feel free to contact us at

855-345-3867 or Trademarks@Winterllp.com

LOCATIONS

ORANGE COUNTY

1901 Newport Blvd.
Suite 350 – Third Floor
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
949.999.2058 P
949.999.2059 F

TRUCKEE-TAHOE

12134 Stallion Way,
Truckee, CA 96161
949.999.2058 P
949.999.2059 F

ARIZONA

7150 E. Camelback Rd.
Suite 444 – Fourth Floor
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
949.999.2058 P
949.999.2059 F

Located in  California, the law firm of Winter Law L.L.P. represents clients throughout California, including, but not limited to the cities of  San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose, Sacramento, Los Angeles, Santa Ana, Yorba Linda, San Juan Capistrano, Mission Viejo, Newport Beach, Huntington Beach, Tustin, Irvine, Costa Mesa, Fullerton, Brea, Corona, Chino, Temecula, Lake Elsinore and Orange County, Los Angeles County, Riverside County, San Bernardino County and San Diego County.

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by Winter LLP and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

About | Contact | Terms